Comment below by Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist
California Republican Elizabeth Emken, is challenging 20-year incumbent Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein for her seat in November. She told The Daily Caller that her opponent is “protecting Washington insiders” with regard to Operation Fast and Furious. To find out more about California’s future Senator please visit Elizabeth here.
“Rather than Feinstein trumpeting her own gun control agenda here, she should be working to the get the truth out to the American public,” Emken said in a phone interview. “And, I believe (House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell) Issa is very meticulous in ensuring that this is a fact-based investigation. Where will it end? I think you and I both have a pretty good guess, based on the obfuscation, deflecting and delay, everything that they can do rather than actually produce the records.”
The Department of Justice program claimed the lives of at least 300 Mexican civilians, Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and, possibly, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata. Feinstein has used the incidents as a platform to promote her gun control agenda. (RELATED: Sen. Feinstein: Lax gun control is real ‘problem’ with Fast and Furious )
“My concern, Mr. Chairman, is there’s been a lot said about Fast and Furious, and perhaps mistakes were made, but I think this hunt for blame doesn’t really speak about the problem,” Feinstein said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last November that Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer testified at. “And the problem is, anybody can walk in and buy anything: .50-caliber weapons, sniper weapons, buy them in large amounts, and send them down to Mexico. So, the question really becomes, what do we do about this?”
Feinstein proceeded to make a case for new gun control regulations. Feinstein made a similar argument during Attorney General Eric Holder’s Nov. 8, 2011 appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
It’s unclear, though, how Feinstein believes that more gun laws would stop government officials who are charged with enforcing gun laws from breaking the laws they’re supposed to enforce — which is exactly what happened in Operation Fast and Furious.
During the program, rather than interdict weapons that were being trafficked into Mexico by “straw purchasers,” the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives allowed the weapons to “walk.” In Fast and Furious, those straw purchasers turned around and trafficked about 2,000 weapons to Mexican drug cartels. Straw purchasers are people who buy weapons in the United States with the known intention of turning around and illegally selling them to somebody else.
ATF officials knew what these straw purchasers were doing in Fast and Furious, and chose to allow these transactions to continue instead of intervening. That means the ATF allowed the guns to get into the hands of the drug cartels — or let them “walk” — instead of seizing the weapons beforehand.
Comment by Jim Campbell
Clearly Senator Feinstein has little interest in the truth. She has her own agenda. When not attempting to coverup her own malfeasance she’s there to the rescue of the alleged perjurer Attorney General Eric “Who Me” Holder.
Perhaps there is nothing more that the Too Wrong for Too Long incumbent 78-year-old Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein enjoys more than bashing the Second Amendment. O.k. I admit she enjoys raising California’s taxes and spending taxpayers money on questionable projects that benefit the San Francisco Bay, like the monies she ear marked for the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). There there was $10 million: Muni Third Street light rail (Pelosi, Feinstein, Boxer) in which all three of the “Tax and Spend Sisters” spent tax dollars to “improve Northern California. Then here boondoggle, $14 million: Hamilton Airfield wetlands restoration. (More of Feinstein’s wasteful spending below.)
In 1993, Feinstein, led the fight to ban many semi-automatic firearms and restrict the sale of firearm magazines deemed “assault weapons.” The ban was passed as Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, Subtitle A of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. In 2004, when the ban was set to expire, Feinstein sponsored a 10-year extension of the ban as an amendment to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; while the amendment was successfully added, the act itself failed. The act was then revived in 2005, and, despite Feinstein’s best efforts, was passed without an extension of the assault weapons ban. Let’s stop with these as I could go on and on and I believe California voters are getting the point. Feinstein’s $10 million: Corp of Engineers work on the Napa River. $14 million: Hamilton Airfield wetlands restoration, $8 million: Bay Area regional water recycling program, Feinstein, $3.5 million: San Francisco Bay long-term and management strategy, and finally her $12 million: Large crash rescue station at Travis Air Force Base. Noticeably absent was any legislation directed to the southern part of the state.